A comment on Troy Southgate’s Facebook text on Emanuele Severino “who was the opposite of Heidegger in the sense that he rejects the dichotomy of ‘being’ and ‘non-being'” (January 30, 2022)
Here are two short videos (9 min each) where –– in a larger sens but with the advantage of ENGLISH AND FRENCH SUBTITELS –– the question of being & non-being, of death & life on the living body, are treated in a post-philosophical, rather emotion-centred way:
There are two other series of videos where I follow this question of being and non-being in an explicite and direct sens as an introduction to Depth Truth. They are even more appropriate but unfortunately there are NO ENGLISH SUBTITES yet. That is why I had to chose a substitute with the above videos, but I think one has a good impression of the work at the Institute of Depth Truth. Actually this question of being & non-being, of death & life, is the main question of the work at the Institute of Depth Truth:
1.
Søren Kierkegaard, Post-Existence-Philosophy and Depth Truth, part 1: Non-Being:
Part 2: Suffering & Torment:
part 3: Being:
2.
Hölderlin & Depth Truth,
part 1: [The way] Into Trans-Intellectuality:
part 2: Hölderlin’s Psycho-Biographical Background:
part 3: Escape from cramp/spasm & constraint of philosophy:
part 4: Reunion of mind & feeling in action – with the Ballad of the Re-conflation/Re-conciliation of Two Voices (“[Wieder]-Übereinstimmung” ([re]-concordance, [re]accordance) being a central term both of Schelling and Hölderlin):
In these videos, other thinkers than only Hölderlin and Schelling appear, especially Heidegger who adored Hölderlin but could not follow him at all (Heidegger betrayed Hölderlin shamefully). Heidegger is the counterpart of Depth Truth: Heidegger stands for everything against which the work is being done at the Institute for Depth Truth. He actually is the biggest loser (you can see it on his face). Instead of – the time was ripe! – going the way into Trans-Intellectuality, Post-Philosophy, the non-verbal and Trans-Cognizance, Heidegger went exactly the opposite way (“Holzweg”) and pleased himself in inventing even more words and language. Heidegger knew that he was on the Holzweg. He was, like Rudolf Steiner a traitor of himself.
As long as we don’t see that Heidegger was a deceiver who wrote things that he himself knew were only substitutes for life, as long as philosophy does not become post-philosophy, the Great Awakening (Alexander Dugin) will stand stranded against the Great Reset – the Radical Subject (Alexander Dugin) as Katechon against the Great Reset weakened – and cannot triumph because the Radical Subject – the mean and goal of the Great Awakening – cannot be an intellectual because an intellectual is the first step towards the human being without life, a half-robot! The Radical Subject can only be a non-intellectual or a post-intellectual: an owner in the sense of Max Stirner, first Radical Subject in history.
Last but not least my speech at the First National-Anarchist Movement International Conference (17-18 june 2017 in Madrid):